With lots of rumours floating around regarding Nintendo’s next console, we thought we’d add in our own predictions. Feel free to respond to each rumour with your own thoughts in the comments section below!
Rumour: Melee is coming on VC for the Switch.
Ersatz: Semi-plausible. I could see it if there’s a Gamecube VC.
LIQUID12A: No real stance on this one. On one hand, it’s Melee, but on the other hand it seems a bit jarring to possibly throw it on a VC when there’s a heavily rumored Smash Switch port coming along.
Voyager: 90% positive, It could be a great way to catch a lot of eyes at day one.
Nirbion: Very likely. If GameCube VC is going to be a thing, then Melee is almost guaranteed. Melee is the poster child of the GameCube after all.
PushDustIn: If GameCube VC is a thing, I think Melee will absolutely be on it.
TheAnvil: If the Gamecube Virtual Console does end up materialising I don’t think it’ll be as comprehensive as I’d like it to be, regardless Melee would be one of the first games I could see appearing alongside Mario Sunshine and Luigi’s Mansion.
Epicmartin7: Seems plausible. Hopefully the switch can handle Gamecube emulation.
ConnorEatsPants: If it doesn’t happen, prepare for the national headlines to read “Man dies after drowning in his own tears”. Actually, that might happen either way.
Rumour: Smash for Switch will be an enhanced port, with limited amount of content.
Ersatz: Unlikely. Sakurai is already working on another project, and Nintendo wouldn’t change a game without his consent. Will Sakurai consent? Probably not.
LIQUID12A: It’s not uncommon to see game directors look over several projects at one; I personally think that if a Smash Switch were to get some new content, it wouldn’t be too much of a hassle to supervise over said limited content without taking time away from whatever he’s working on now.
Voyager: It would be a first time for Nintendo and Sakurai, but it could be a good chance to profit a little more with the huge amount of work that they put on Smash 3DS/WiiU.
Nirbion: It’s a new to Sakurai, so I can see him taking that challenge for a change. I know he really despite working on “a slightly improved” version of his games, but this might be his chance to “change the game”.
PushDustIn: I think we’ll end up getting more content than what my source has told me, but we’ll find out. It really depends on if Sakurai is coming back, and how much of a focus it is for Bandai Namco. Since it’s a new Smash game, I think it should get a lot of focus as it’s a major IP.
TheAnvil: I’m pretty certain a Smash for Switch Port is on its way, and everything seems to indicate additional content. It’s not out of the question that Sakurai could oversee a port with new content in addition to another project.
IntelliHeath: I completely understand people would rather to believe in the rumors that we are going to get low amounts of contents because it’s way better to set our expectation low for the franchise we love so we wouldn’t get disappointed at the end. See what would happens if people really have high expectations then it would led themselves into meltdown or/and being childish about things they didn’t get. we are entering into new territory with Smash for Switch speculation because of the rumors and lack of information we have. Hypothetically Smash for Switch might see like 12-16 months development if we predicted correctly. Please keep it in your mind that they would have to focus on other contents, other than characters. They probably have to port some contents from Smash for 3DS to Switch, along with Smash for Wii U such as stages, trophies, Smash Run, etc. In other hand, it’s still plausible they could create new single player contents to be featured in Smash for Switch. Also they probably have to make more contents for DLC characters (Palutena’s Guidance, Custom Moves, etc.) Basically everything is possibilities for Smash Bros. for Switch since we have nothing to go with but rumors.
My gut feeling is telling me that we are going to get more contents than what rumors claimed because I don’t really feel that it was Sakurai-ish to not outdone himself with the franchise which he considered as his baby. Also Sakurai was against the idea of Nintendo going with Melee port with online mode being only addition in the past which led him to work on Super Smash Bros Brawl. It’s really tough to predict what’s going on with Sakurai and Nintendo right now. I would like to point out there is a chance that the source probably have a limited knowledge on what’s going with. You could take a look at Gematsu Leak, and notice that the source wasn’t even in know with Duck Hunt and Bowser Jr being playable characters, along with Chrom and Chorus Men being cut. I do think it’s best for all of us to set our expectation low as possible.
Expect for the Worst, but Hope for the Best
ConnorEatsPants: Yeah man it’ll happen
Rumour: Pokemon Stars for the Switch
Ersatz: Probable. Pokemon for Switch will happen but this soon may be up in the air. I expect “Stars” for 3DS.
LIQUID12A: Later on, probably not at the Switch presentation next week. Would seem very early to announce a third version when the previous titles are barely under 2 months old.
Voyager: The Switch is, in some way, the new Nintendo handheld system, I would prefer a brand new game instead of a enhanced version, but an enhanced version of Sun/Moon would be nice. But I don’t expect them to show it on this presentation, maybe on E3.
Nirbion: Not on this event. I even doubt it’s happening this year. But on the other hand, this is usually the time-window where GameFreak announces their Pokémon projects. So it’s more a 50:50 from me.
PushDustIn: I believe this rumor, a lot of Pokemon Sun/Moon seems like it was designed around one screen.
TheAnvil: The ‘Stars’ subtitle sounds rather made up, but we already know a Pokemon game is going to appear on the Switch eventually.
ConnorEatsPants: Definitely am betting on this. The “follower pokemon” data-mine in Sun and Moon confirmed it for me.
Rumour: Strong Ubisoft support for the Switch
Ersatz: If “strong” means Just Dance and another port, I’d say yes.
LIQUID12A: Ports I can see, but full on support, not likely.
Voyager: If “strong” means other than ports of existing games… I hope so.
Nirbion: I disagree. Let’s not forget how Ubisoft tried to support the Wii U and their games-output was strong with Rayman, Assassin’s Creed and even Watch Dogs, which turned out to be a pretty good version. They dropped the Wii U when they realised there’s no money to make with Wii U-games, but compared to other 3rd-Party-Developers, it’s a lot. So I think we will see a strong Ubisoft presence here.
PushDustIn: I think we’ll get a lot of ports initially, and if they do well, then we’ll see actually support.
TheAnvil: People like to give Ubisoft flack for their ‘abandonment’ of Nintendo following the failure of the Wii U, but the truth is that Ubisoft released over a dozen games for the system. I have absolutely no doubt that Ubisoft will support the Switch.
ConnorEatsPants: They’ll support it for as long as the system sells, like everyone else.
Rumour: Share button to Record Gameplay
Ersatz: Probable, if only because of my thoughts on the rumor below.
LIQUID12A: The Switch seems like a good candidate for this type of feature and I’d be willing to back this rumor.
Voyager: As much as a good as it might sound, I don’t think they would allow to share the videos on Youtube without trying to monetizing it themselves.
Nirbion: Likely, but under a totally different name. I don’t see Nintendo accepted established featured features from their competitors without giving it their own twist. Maybe more a “Miiverse Button”, which opens the Miiverse Interface instantly?
PushDustIn: It makes sense. All other modern consoles have it. Hopefully Nintendo can also fix their YouTube policies.
TheAnvil: Absolutely, other systems have this feature.
ConnorEatsPants: Makes it easier for Nintendo to claim people’s content. So I fully believe it.
Rumour: Miiverse is not coming back
Ersatz: Absolutely not. There’s no way that Miiverse isn’t returning in some form. I can see some changes to streamline it, but there’s no way Nintendo would retire Miiverse.
LIQUID12A: Uh, no. Miiverse is pretty well established at this point, so at worst it’d get retooled from the mess that it is.
Voyager: No way, they could expand it, but not cut it.
Nirbion: Like written above, I can see Miiverse getting retooled to fit better the “Share Button”. I agree that Miiverse is way too integrated in Nintendo’s system-environment so I rather think we will see a “revival of Miiverse”, maybe even with a new name.
PushDustIn: I think it’ll be Miiverse+. It’ll function in similar ways to Miiverse, but it’ll be a different take. Maybe they will expand upon Miitomo?
TheAnvil: As everyone else has suggested, it’ll probably be retooled rather than cut.
Epicmartin7: Yeah. It makes me wonder its not coming back if Nintendo hasn’t really been moderating Miiverse that well lately. We’ll see what it does get replaced with.
IntelliHeath: I’m not even surprised when I heard about the rumor. I’m pretty sure that they probably going to implement brand new “Miiverse” but much better.
ConnorEatsPants: It’s probably “gone” in a sense but replaced with a very similar concept.
Latest posts by TheAnvil (see all)
- 3Souls Review: Complete Edition - October 11, 2017
- Marvel vs. Capcom Infinite Review - September 26, 2017
- What SG Choice: What Indie Games Should be in Travis Strikes Again: No More Heroes? - September 16, 2017